J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 44:745-753.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. M.

Factors Affecting Birth Weight, Dystocia and Preweaning Survival in Sheep1

Gerald M. Smith2

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, NB 68933

Abstract

Data from 3,535 purebred (PB) and 3,178 crossbred (XB) lambs were analyzed to determine the attention that should be given dystocia and lamb survival in selection programs for terminal sire breeds. Both dystocia and lamb mortality were quadratically related (P<.01) to birth weight. Dystocia was minimal (9 to 15%) at birth weights of about 3.5 kg, whereas mortality was minimal (26 to 30%) at about 5.5 kilograms. Dystocia increased lamb mortality by 8.6 (PB) and 4.8% (XB). Single-born lambs were heavier at birth (4.6 ± .03 vs 3.6 ± .04 kg, PB; 4.7 ± .03 vs 3.6 ± .03 kg, XB) and had fewer deaths (28.6 ± 1.8 vs 47.7 ± 2.3%, PB; 27.7 ± 1.8 vs 46.6 ± 1.7%, XB) than multiple-born lambs. Single-born XB lambs also had more dystocia than multiple-born lambs (13 ± 1.0 vs 8 ± .9%); however, an unexplained breed by type of birth interaction (P<.01) negated the effect of type birth on dystocia of PB lambs. The .13 ± .03 heritability estimate for dystocia was not changed by accounting for differences in birth weight. Large differences in percent lamb mortality, which were not attributable to birth weight or dystocia, were found among Suffolk- (41.9 ± 1.9), Hampshire- (36.8 ± 1.9) and Oxford-sired (32.8 ± 1.8) lambs; however, the .06 ± .03 heritability estimate for lamb survival discourages direct intrapopulation selection for viability. Also, the low heritability estimate for vigor (.10 ± .03) and its low genetic correlation with lamb survival (.16 ± .28) would discourage its use as a selection criterion for improving survival. Selection for increased size and growth rate in terminal sire breeds with little concern about dystocia or preweaning survival seems warranted, especially if they are to be mated with highly prolific ewes.


Footnotes

1 The cooperation of the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, is acknowledged. Contribution from North Central Regional Project NC-111, Increased Efficiency of Lamb Production, and Western Regional Project W(M)-137, Increased Efficiency in Marketing of Lamb and Mutton.

2 U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, North Central Region, Agricultural Research Service.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. M. Dwyer
Genetic and physiological determinants of maternal behavior and lamb survival: Implications for low-input sheep management
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E246 - E258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. C. Borg, D. R. Notter, L. A. Kuehn, and R. W. Kott
Breeding objectives for Targhee sheep
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 2815 - 2829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.