J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 44:601-607.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friend, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friend, D. W.

Effect of Dietary energy and protein on age and weight at puberty of gilts1

D. W. Friend2

Agricultural Canada, Research Branch, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OC6

Abstract

Fifty-four gilts (averaging 111 days of age and 49 kg body weight) were used in a 32 factorial experiment in each of 3 years; dietary treatments were supplements of 0, 10 and 20% levels of soybean oil and 0, 3 and 6% levels of purified soybean protein. The diets were limit-fed until the onset of puberty (first estrus); the limit of daily feed intake being set, within each replicate, by the gilt fed to appetite the diet containing 20% oil plus 6% soybean protein. Age at puberty averaged 168 days (range 127 to 212 days) and was affected by neither soybean oil (energy) nor soybean protein (crude protein) supplementation of the control (0% oil, 0% soybean protein) diet. Body weight at puberty was increased significantly by the addition of soybean oil, but not protein, to the diet. Increasing the energy and protein content of the diet gave significantly higher rates of body weight gain compared with controls. The efficiency of calorie and protein utilization did not differ among levels of intake but significant interaction effects pointed to a need for increased dietary energy with increased protein intake, to maintain conversion efficiency


Footnotes

1 Animal Research Institute, Contribution No. 652

2 The author wishes to acknowledge consultation on statistical matters with Dr. Mark S. Wolynetz (Research Branch, Statistical Research Service). The staff responsible for animal care and management were R. A. E. Armstrong, W. R. Berube, D. D. Milligan and G. N. Simmons







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.