J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1977. 44:389-394.
© 1977 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrold, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nalejawa, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harrold, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nalejawa, J. D.

Proximate, Mineral and Amino Acid Composition of 15 Weed Seeds

R. L. Harrold1 and J. D. Nalejawa2,3,

North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102

Abstract

Density, proximate composition, content of selected minerals, and amino acid content of seeds of 15 weeds are presented. In general, the composition of the weed seeds differed from that expected for cereal grains by having higher content of fibrous components, ash, ether extract, gross energy, and crude protein than that expected for small grains. Calcium, phosphorus, and magnesium were present at levels much higher than would be expected in the case of cereal grains. Amino acid content of the weed seeds reflected their generally high crude protein content.

The composition of the weed seeds which constituted the bulk of the mixed dockage or screenings (wild buckwheat, green and yellow foxtail and wild oats) approximated that of cultivated grains more closely than did seeds of other less frequently encountered weeds.

The apparent density of the intact weed seeds was, in general, less than that of cereal grains. The four weeds whose seeds were considered to be of primary economic significance had densities similar to that of high-quality oats.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science.

2 Department of Agronomy.

3 The authors wish to thank Dr. Calvin Messersmith for providing the sample of wild buckwheat and Dr. Jerry L. Sell for his helpful review of the manuscript.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1977 by the American Society of Animal Science.