J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1976. 43:1049-1057.
© 1976 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jesse, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hutcheson, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jesse, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hutcheson, D. P.

Effects of Various Ratios of Corn and Corn Silage and Slaughter Weight on the Performance of Steers Individually Fed1

George W. Jesse2, G. B. Thompson, J. L. Clark, K. G. Weimer and D. P. Hutcheson3

University of Missouri,4, Columbia 65201

Abstract

Fifty-six Hereford steers were used in this experiment designed to determine the effects of different combinations of corn and corn silage and slaughter weight on cattle performance. Eight of the calves were slaughtered initially (227 kg) to determine beginning composition and the other 48 were assigned in equal numbers to the 12 treatments. The rations fed were isonitrogenous and included the following ratios of corn to corn silage (dry basis): (A) 30:70; (B) 50:50; (C) 70:30; and (D) 80:20. Ending weights were: (1) 341 kg; (2) 454 kg; and (3) 545 kilograms. The steers were individually fed throughout the test. Bomb calorimeter determinations were made on the feed and body tissues to enable the calculation of energetic efficiency.

Steers fed the high silage A ration were slower gaining (P<.05) averaging .90 kg per day. Although cattle performance on the other rations was quite similar (1.06, 1.13 and 1.11 kg/day for B, C and D, respectively) feeding a higher level of corn grain than that of ration C does not appear advantageous. Most carcass traits were quite similar; however the fastest gaining, ration C cattle did produce the fatter, higher grading carcasses.

Gross energetic efficiency (Meal energy gained/Mcal G.E. consumed) increased as slaughter weight increased with peak conversions of 16.5 and 11.9% for empty body and carcass gains, respectively. Hence, the fattening process appears to be a more efficient process (calorically) than the growth process (protein deposition).

Footnotes

1 Contribution from the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station. Journal Series No. 7369. Approved by the Director.

2 Present address: Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station.

3 The authors wish to thank Mr. Logan McClelland for his assistance in feeding and slaughtering of the steers.

4 Department of Animal Husbandry.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Society of Animal Science.