J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1976. 43:71-77.
© 1976 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, O. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, O. W.

Effects of Postnatal Maternal Environment on Reproduction of Gilts1

R. E. Nelson2 and O. W. Robinson

North Carolina State University, Raleign 27607

Abstract

Postnatal maternal environments were compared for their effects on the reproductive performance of female swine. Crossfostering was used to establish postnatal environments of small (six pigs) and large (14 pigs) litters. These litter sizes were formed by reallotting pigs between two dams within 24 hr of parturition. Standardized litters from 46 pairs provided a total of 270 females for mating. Failure of females to exhibit estrus or to conceive was essentially equal for those raised in small and large litters.

Individual weights diverged (P<.01) by 14 days between females raised in small and large litters. This divergence (.49 kg) increased to 4.49 kg at weaning (8 weeks). The difference in weights was only slightly greater at 140 days. Age at onset of first estrus was not significantly different between treatment groups.

Advantages for females reared in small litters were noted in all replications for both corpora lutea and embryo number. Overall advantages of 1.01 for corpora lutea (P<.05) and 1.18 for embryo number (P<.10) were found. While not as consistent among replications, overall advantages for total number born and number born alive were .88 and 1.18 (P<.10), respectively.

Due to the limited data, statistical tests of litter size differences were not very sensitive. However, the consistent advantages in corpora lutea, embryo number and litter size of females reared in litters of six pigs indicate that postnatal maternal environment may have an important effect on reproductive traits.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 4807 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Experiment Station, Raleigh.

2 Present address: Kleen Leen Inc., Cedar Rapids, Iowa.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. R. Foxcroft, W. T. Dixon, S. Novak, C. T. Putman, S. C. Town, and M. D. A. Vinsky
The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E105 - E.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Society of Animal Science.