|
|
||||||||
University of California2, Davis 95616
Abstract
Forty-six Hereford heifers were slaughtered at different stages of gestation. Udders and gravid uteri were removed. Each gravid uterus was dissected into fetus, fetal membranes, fetal fluids and uterus. Fresh weights, dry matter, ether extract, ash, nitrogen and gross energy contents of the various tissues were determined. Weights and compositions of udders and uteri from 36 non-pregnant heifers were also determined. Relationships of the type W = Woe (b1 - b2t)t where t is the number of days after mating, Wo is the amount of constituent on the day of mating and W is the amount of constituent on day t of gestation were derived to describe growth of different constituents of the gravid uterus during gestation.
Udder development was most rapid after 234 days of gestation as indicated by ash and nitrogen contents. Udders of pregnant heifers contained approximately 48, 60, 67 and 102 g nitrogen at 134, 189, 237 and 264 days of gestation, respectively and udders of non-pregnant heifers contained approximately 37 g nitrogen. No net accumulation of energy occurred in udders of pregnant heifers relative to that gained in udders of non-pregnant heifers.
Fetuses averaged 1.58, 7.53, 20.8 and 31.6 kg and contained 1.20, 1.60, 2.07 and 2.52% nitrogen at 134, 189, 237 and 264 days of gestation, respectively. Gross energy contents of fetuses were .54, .88, 1.17 and 1.32 kcal/g fresh weight at each of these times. Rates of nitrogen and energy storage in the gravid uterus were estimated to be .76, 2.79, 8.95 and 25.0 g/day and 36.0, 143, 457 and 1,167 kcal/day at 100, 160, 220 and 280 days of gestation, respectively. None of these values was affected by fetal sex or maternal energy intake (150 or 215 kcal ME/W3/4/day).
1 Present address: U.S. Meat Center, Clay Center, Nebraska.
2 Department of Animal Science.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. L. Bennett, R. M. Thallman, W. M. Snelling, and L. A. Kuehn Experimental selection for calving ease and postnatal growth in seven cattle populations. II. Phenotypic differences J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2103 - 2114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. C. Beukes, C. C. Palliser, K. A. Macdonald, J. A. S. Lancaster, G. Levy, B. S. Thorrold, and M. E. Wastney Evaluation of a Whole-Farm Model for Pasture-Based Dairy Systems J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2008; 91(6): 2353 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Freetly, J. A. Nienaber, and T. Brown-Brandl Partitioning of energy in pregnant beef cows during nutritionally induced body weight fluctuation J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 370 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Hanigan, H. G. Bateman, J. G. Fadel, and J. P. McNamara Metabolic Models of Ruminant Metabolism: Recent Improvements and Current Status J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2006; 89(e_suppl_1): E52 - E64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Freetly, C. L. Ferrell, and T. G. Jenkins Nutritionally altering weight gain patterns of pregnant heifers and young cows changes the time that feed resources are offered without any differences in production J Anim Sci, April 1, 2005; 83(4): 916 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |