J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1976. 42:1104-1109.
© 1976 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perry, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Le Grand, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Perry, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Le Grand, W. L.

Nutritional Value of Condensed Soybean Solubles for Beef Cattle and Sheep1,2,

T. W. Perry, J. B. Outhouse, W. M. Beeson, I. Hagsten, M. T. Mohler and W. L. Le Grand

Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Abstract

One cattle experiment and two lamb experiments were conducted to study the nutritive value of condensed soy solubles (CSS). In the cattle trial CSS was substituted for cane molasses in a high urea beef cattle supplement, in the presence of either 14% dehydrated alfalfa meal or 14% ground corn cobs in the supplement. Performance (rate of gain and efficiency of feed conversion) was not significantly different among the treatments indicating CSS may substitute for cane molasses in cattle supplement formulation.

Levels of 0, 2.5, 5, 10 or 15% condensed soy solubles were substituted for corn in pelleted complete lamb diets in two experiments. Although rates of gain among the treatments were not significantly different, efficiencies of feed conversion indicated CSS could replace for an equal weight of corn up to a practical maximum of 10% of the total diet without appreciably altering rate of gain or efficiency of feed conversion appreciably.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Sciences, Journal Paper No. 6004, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station. The Authors Acknowledge the Assistance of Mrs. Alice Bales with the Chemical Analyses.

2 The research reported herein was supported by grants-in-aid from A. E. Staley Company, Decatur, Illinois, and The Griffith Laboratories, Remington, Indiana.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Society of Animal Science.