J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1976. 42:717-723.
© 1976 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golding, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ruelke, O. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Golding, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ruelke, O. C.

Formulation of Hay-Grain Diets for Ruminants II. Depression in Voluntary Intake of Different Quality Forages by Limited Grain in Sheep1, 2,

E. J. Golding3, J. E. Moore3, D. E. Franke3 and O. C. Ruelke4

University of Florida, Gainesville 32611

Abstract

Objective supplementation of forage with grain requires knowledge of (1) forage quality, and (2) the depression in forage intake due to grain feeding. Four ‘Suwannee’ bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] hays of 4-, 6-, 8- and 10-week regrowth were fed ad libitum with and without limited grain to sheep. The amount of grain offered in each hay-grain diet was restricted such that it provided an estimated 50% of the total digestible energy (DE) intake. Determination of this amount of grain was based upon: (1) predicted DE intakes of hays when fed alone, and (2) expected replacement rates (kilocalories of hay DE intake depression per kilocalorie of grain DE consumed).

When hays were fed alone, gross energy (GE) intake decreased (P<.05) with advancing maturity from 4- to 6-weeks and from 8- to 10-weeks regrowth. When incorporated in hay-grain diets, however, there were no differences (P>.05) among hays in GE intake. Digestibility of hay GE was depressed (P<.05) by grain feeding in all but the 10-week hay. All hay-grain diets had higher (P<.05) GE digestibilities and DE intakes than the comparable hays when fed alone. Depression of hay DE intake due to grain was greatest with the highest-quality hay and least with the lowest-quality hay. Consequently, the greatest increase in total DE intake was achieved by supplementing the lowest-quality hay.


Footnotes

1 Florida Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal Series No. 5862.

2 From a thesis submitted by the senior author to the Graduate School, University of Florida, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree, Master of Science in Agriculture. Acknowledgment is given to the Center for Tropical Agriculture, University of Florida, for financial assistance.

3 Animal Science Department.

4 Agronomy Department.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. H. Fike, C. R. Staples, L. E. Sollenberger, B. Macoon, and J. E. Moore
Pasture Forages, Supplementation Rate, and Stocking Rate Effects on Dairy Cow Performance
J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2003; 86(4): 1268 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Society of Animal Science.