J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1975. 41:1021-1030.
© 1975 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McConnel, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McConnel, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Johnston, W. E.

Corn, Wheat, Milo and Barley with Soybean Meal or Roasted Soybeans and Their Effect on Feedlot Performance, Carcass Traits and Pork Acceptability1

J. C. McConnel2, G. C. Skelley2, D. L. Handlin2 and W. E. Johnston3

Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631

Abstract

Feedlot performance, carcass traits and the acceptability of fresh and stored pork samples were monitored on three replicates of pigs fed diets based on corn, wheat, milo or barley with soybean meal or roasted whole soybeans as the supplemental protein. The corn-based diets contained 16% crude protein for pigs weighing 21 to 57 kg and 14% crude protein from 57 to 101 kilograms. The other respective diets were formulated by substituting either wheat, milo or barley on a unit-for-unit basis for corn.

Over the entire experimental period (21 to 101 kg), all treatments except barley-soybean meal promoted similar (P>.05) daily gains. Three significantly different (P<.05) groupings of treatments based on efficiencies of feed conversion were noted, which, ranked from most to least acceptable, were: corn and wheat containing either protein source; barley-roasted soybeans; and milo with either protein or barley-soybean meal. Data were also presented which indicated feedlot response to each treatment during both the growing and the finishing phases of production.


Footnotes

1 Technical Contribution No. 1206 of the South Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station published with the approval of the Director.

2 Department of Animal Science.

3 Experimental Statistician.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. F. Lampe, T. J. Baas, and J. W. Mabry
Comparison of grain sources for swine diets and their effect on meat and fat quality traits
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 1022 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Animal Science.