J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1975. 41:819-824.
© 1975 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corah, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaltenbach, C. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Corah, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaltenbach, C. C.

Influence of Prepartum Nutrition on the Reproductive Performance of Beef Females and the Performance of Their Progeny1, 2,

L. R. Corah3, T. G. Dunn4 and C. C. Kaltenbach4

University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071

Abstract

Two experiments were designed to assess the importance of maternal nutrition in the later stages of gestation on reproductive performance of beef females and on the growth and survival of their calves. In experiment 1, 59 Hereford first-calf heifers were assigned to one of two levels of dietary energy (high [H] which was 100% of the recommended level of prepartum energy or low [L] which was 65% of the N.R.C. [1970] recommended level) 100 days prior to predicted calving. After calving both groups were fed N.R.C. (1970) recommended levels of energy and protein.

Heifers fed the H ration gained 36.1 kg during the 100-day prepartum period while the heifers on the L ration lost 5.8 kilograms. The heifers restricted in energy prepartum had lighter calves at birth but the calves were born with the same degree of calving difficulty as calves of adequately fed dams. More calves from nutritionally deprived heifers died at or near birth and the surviving calves were lighter at weaning.


Footnotes

1 Published with approval of Director, Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article No. 682.

2 Appreciation is expressed to American Breeders Service for kindly providing the semen used in the experiment.

3 NDEA Fellow and Australian Meat Board scholarship recipient. Current address, Department of Animal Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan.

4 Division of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Martin, K. A. Vonnahme, D. C. Adams, G. P. Lardy, and R. N. Funston
Effects of dam nutrition on growth and reproductive performance of heifer calves
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 841 - 847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. A. Stalker, D. C. Adams, T. J. Klopfenstein, D. M. Feuz, and R. N. Funston
Effects of pre- and postpartum nutrition on reproduction in spring calving cows and calf feedlot performance
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2582 - 2589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
L. P. Reynolds, P. P. Borowicz, K. A. Vonnahme, M. L. Johnson, A. T. Grazul-Bilska, D. A. Redmer, and J. S. Caton
Placental angiogenesis in sheep models of compromised pregnancy
J. Physiol., May 15, 2005; 565(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Animal Science.