J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1975. 41:534-540.
© 1975 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prost, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kotula, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Prost, E.
Right arrow Articles by Kotula, A. W.

Quality Characteristics of Bovine Meat. I. Content of Connective Tissue in Relation to Individual Muscles, Age and Sex of Animals and Carcass Quality Grade1

E. Prost, E. Pelczynska and A. W. Kotula2

Academy of Agriculture,3, Lublin, Poland

Abstract

The content of connective tissue was determined in seven muscles of 80 bovine carcasses, in relation to age and sex of animals and post-slaughter carcass grade, by the hydroxyproline and the histometric methods. Among the seven muscles, differences in connective tissue were large and significant. No consistent change in level of connective tissue was associated with the age of animals. In the individual muscles the influence of age was either nonsignificant or if significant, was not consistent between age groups. Generally the influence of sex of animals on the content of connective tissue was not significant. In the histometric determination of connective tissue in design I the combined means were higher in males than in females. Grade differences relative to connective tissue content were evident for data in design I in both the hydroxyproline and the histometric methods, with grade II having higher connective tissue content. The correlation of all means determined by the hydroxyproline and histometric methods was r = .69, and was significant (P<.01).


Footnotes

1 Supported by PL-480 Grant No. FG-229 from U. S. Department of Agriculture.

2 Meat Sciences Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705.

3 Department of Hygiene of Animal Products.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. E. Patten, J. M. Hodgen, A. M. Stelzleni, C. R. Calkins, D. D. Johnson, and B. L. Gwartney
Chemical properties of cow and beef muscles: Benchmarking the differences and similarities
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1904 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Animal Science.