J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1975. 41:508-512.
© 1975 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedrick, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hedrick, H. B.
Right arrow Articles by Krause, G. F.

Comparisons of Predicted and Actual Retail Yields from Steer and Heifer Carcasses and Equations for Estimating Retail Yield1

H. B. Hedrick and G. F. Krause

University of Missouri, Columbia 65201

Abstract

Actual retail yields of 590 steer and 240 heifer carcasses were compared to their predicted yields as determined by the present U.S.D.A. yield grade equation. The carcasses were of the Prime, Choice and Good quality grades. Actual yields of steer and heifer carcasses exceeded the predicted retail yields by 1.91 and 1.15%, respectively. Retail yields of steer carcasses exceeded that of heifer carcasses by .76%. When carcasses were grouped into low, average and high cutability groups the predicted retail yields of low cutability carcasses exceeded the actual retail yields for steer carcasses by 1.20% and for heifer carcasses by 1.59%. For average and high cutability groups the predicted retail yields were less than the actual retail yields for steers by 1.23 and 3.49% and .86 and 2.99% for heifers, respectively. Prediction equations for percent retail cuts of the primal cuts and total retail cuts were computed for steer and heifer carcasses, respectively. These equations are less biased for the Prime, Choice and Good grades and steer and heifer classes than the U.S.D.A. equation.


Footnotes

1 Contribution from Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, Journal Series No. 7155. Approved by the Director.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. P. Greiner, G. H. Rouse, D. E. Wilson, L. V. Cundiff, and T. L. Wheeler
Accuracy of predicting weight and percentage of beef carcass retail product using ultrasound and live animal measures
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(2): 466 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Animal Science.