J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1975. 40:1034-1038.
© 1975 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Utley, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, W. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Utley, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McCormick, W. C.

Finishing Beef Cattle for Slaughter on All-Forage Diets

P. R. Utley1, R. E. Hellwig2 and W. C. McCormick1

Coast Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, Georgia 31794

Abstract

Thirty-two crossbred calves (223 kg) and 36 crossbred yearlings (306 kg) were finished for slaughter with either a conventional high-energy diet or an all-forage diet to study the feedlot performance, carcass characteristics and economic feasibility of each system. Steers fed the high-energy diet gained 2.97 lb (1.35 kg) daily (P < .05) and steers fed the all-forage diet gained 2.33 lb (1.06 kg) daily. Average daily gains of steer calves and yearlings were similar when fed the all-forage diet. However, average gain for yearlings was 8% faster (P > .05) than for calves when fed the high-energy diet. Steers fed the high-energy diet dressed out about 7.5% more (P < .05) carcass, had more marbling (P < .05), higher yield grades (P < .05) and more fat covering over the rib eye (P < .05) than steers fed the all-forage diet. Carcass grades of steers in all groups averaged medium to high good. Under the conditions of these trials, finishing steers of both age groups was more profitable when an all-forage diet was fed.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science.

2 Agriculture Engineers, Ga. —S.C. Area, A.R.S., U.S.D.A.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Byerly
Ruminant livestock research and development
Science, February 4, 1977; 195(4277): 450 - 456.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the American Society of Animal Science.