J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1974. 39:871-878.
© 1974 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mercuri, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Mercuri, A. J.

Characteristics of Packer-Style Hams Quality Graded Prior to Processing

Carl E. Davis1, W. E. Townsend1, H. C. McCampbell2 and A. J. Mercuri1,3,4,

U. S. Department of Agriculture , Richard B. Russell Agriculture Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30604 and University of Georgia, Athens 30602

Abstract

Two trials of 30 hams each were quality graded (Wisconsin Pork Quality Standards) on the pork cutting line into three quality groups of 10 hams each. The groups were pale, soft, exudative (PSE), normal and dark, firm, dry (DFD) hams. pH of the semimembranosus, gluteus medius and gluteus accessorius (of each quality group) in both trials were significantly (P < .01) different among quality groups. Percent weight losses during smoking/cooking and overnight chilling were significantly affected by ham quality in both trials. Percent finished yield of hams was significantly (P < .01) affected by fresh ham quality in trial 1 but not in trial 2. During the smoking/cooking process, PSE quality hams in trial 1 lost 2.7% more weight than normal hams and 5% more than DFD hams. Also, PSE hams in trial 2 lost more weight during smoking/cooking than the normal and DFD hams. In each trial, nine hams (three hams per quality group) were sliced and used to determine the effect of quality on oven-cooked yield. Total cooking loss in both trials was significantly linearly related to fresh ham quality score as was total drip loss in trial 1 hams but not in trial 2 hams. Amount of cooked-out fat was not affected by quality group in either trial. However, the fluid phase of the cooked-out juices was linearly (P < .05) related to fresh ham quality with quality 1 (PSE) having the greatest amount, quality 3 (normal) intermediate and quality 5 (DFD) the least amount of cooked-out fluid. Also, the semisolid coagulated fraction of the drip was significantly (P < .05) affected by fresh quality in both trials. Warner-Bratzler shear value was linearly (P < .05) related to quality score. PSE quality hams had higher shear values in both trails than normal or DFD hams.


Footnotes

1 Product Development Research, Animal Products Utilization and Marketing Laboratory, RRC, ARS, U.S.D.A., Athens, Georgia.

2 Department of Animal Science, University of Georgia, Athens.

3 Reference to a company or product name does not imply approval or recommendation of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.

4 The authors acknowledge the advice of Victor Chew in the statistical analysis and E. W. Gross and L. Torcivia for technical laboratory assistance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Animal Science.