J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1974. 39:565-574.
© 1974 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brinsfield, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hawk, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brinsfield, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hawk, H. W.

Ultrastructure of Endometrial Stromal Cells in the Ewe during the Estrous Cycle and Early Pregnancy

T. H. Brinsfield, M. Fisher and H. W. Hawk

U.S. Department of Agriculture1, Beltsville, Maryland 20705

Abstract

On days 0, 10 and 12 through 17 of the estrous cycle, and on days 12 through 17 of pregnancy, determinations were made of the percent cytoplasmic volume occupied by mitochondria, lysosomes, dense bodies and lipid droplets, and of the quantity of rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) in the endometrial stromal cells. Seventy ewes were used.

The ultrastructure of the stromal cells changed markedly during the estrous cycle, the most pronounced change occurring in the RER. On day 0, the RER was abundant and extensively dilated. By days 10, 12 and 13, the RER had decreased in quantity. However, by days 14 through 17, the concentration of RER increased significantly. Mitochondria occupied a greater cytoplasmic volume on day 10 than on any other day. Lysosomes and dense bodies did not vary significantly in quantity. Lipid was low on days 0, 10 and 12, reached a maximum by day 14 and declined by day 17.


Footnotes

1 Animal Physiology and Genetics Institute, A.R.S., Agricultural Research Center. The authors express appreciation to M. V. Clark, Pamela Lloyd and Nancy Faulkner for technical assistance and to Dr. L. R. Miller for assistance in the statistical analysis of the data.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Animal Science.