J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1974. 39:108-114.
© 1974 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hedde, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hedde, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, G. M.

Energy and Protein Utilization in Calves Fed via Rumen by-Pass1

Richard D. Hedde2, Kirvin L. Knox3, Donald E. Johnson and Gerald M. Ward

Colorado State University4, Fort Collins 80521

Abstract

Energy and protein balance experiments and feeding trials were conducted with calves to compare the effects of feeding milk replacer via the rumen vs. the abomasum on feed, energy, and protein utilization efficiencies. Identical diets and similar intake (based on body weight0.75) were fed to paired Holstein bull calves with one receiving the milk replacer portion of the diet as liquid and the other calf receiving dry milk replacer. Bottle fed milk replacer was found to completely by-pass the rumen. In experiment 1, three pairs of calves from 10 to 15 weeks of age received milk replacer at 50% of total intake. Experiment 2 utilized five pairs of calves from 10 to 14 weeks of age that were fed 32% of intake as milk replacer. Energy and nitrogen balances were determined at the conclusion of these feeding periods. Feed efficiency (feed/gain) in experiment 1 was 2.35 and 3.17 and in experiment 2 was 2.83 and 3.72 for the bottle and dry fed calves, respectively (P<.05). Protein digestibility in experiment 1 was 83.5% and 78.8% and for experiment 2 was 78.7% and 71.8% for the bottle and dry feel calves, respectively (P<.05). The slightly higher nitrogen retention (expressed as a percent of nitrogen intake) for the bottle fed calves, 17% in experiment 1 and 7% in experiment 2, was not statistically significant. Energy digestibility in experiment 1 was 86.8% and 82.0%, and in experiment 2 was 80.7% and 76.4% for the bottle and dry fed calves, respectively (P<.05). Methane production ranged from 1 to 2% of gross energy in both experiments with no effect of treatment. The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy for maintenance and gain was approximately 8% better for the bottle fed calves. Fasting heat production was significantly higher (120 vs. 109 kcal/kg0.75) for the bottle fed calves. Thus, by-passing the rumen with milk replacer improved feed efficiency, protein and energy digestibility, and metabolizable energy utilization, but had no effect on nitrogen retention or methane production.

Footnotes

1 Supported by the Colorado State University Experiment Station and published as Scientific Series Paper No. 1899.

2 Present address: Animal Sciences Department, Institute of Agriscience and Nutrition, Syntex Research, 2355 Charleston Road, Mountain View, CA.

3 Present address: Nutritional Sciences Department, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.

4 Department of Animal Sciences.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Animal Science.