J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1974. 38:947-953.
© 1974 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seerley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Amos, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seerley, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Amos, H. E.

Sunflower Meal as a Replacement for Soybean Meal in Growing Swine and Rat Diets

R. W. Seerley1, D. Burdick2, W. C. Russom3, R. S. Lowrey1, H. C. McCampbell1 and H. E. Amos2

University of Georgia,4, Athens, 30602 and Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30601

Abstract

Sunflower meal (SFM) was evaluated as a replacement for soybean meal (SBM) in corn-SBM diets for swine and rats. The effect of heating sunflower seeds, adding supplemental L-lysine monohydrochloride to diets and levels of SFM were studied. Sunflower meal, prepared from decorticated seed heated to 127 C before oil removal with hexane, replacing 50% of the dietary protein from SBM supported faster (P<.05) gains of rats than similarly prepared meal heated to 75 and 100 C. There was no difference (P> .05) in growth among heat treatment groups when SFM replaced 25% of protein from SBM.

The SFM used in subsequent experiments was expeller processed (heated to 127 C). SFM was much higher in methionine than SBM, but it contained only 1.5% lysine compared to the 3.5% lysine in SBM. Consequently, daily gain of pigs was depressed (P< .05) when SFM replaced 50 or 100% of protein from SBM. Replacing 25% of the protein from SBM with SFM did not reduce gains, but feed required per unit of gain was higher (3.30 vs. 3.61). There were no differences (P> .05) in apparent digestibility of corn-SBM and corn-SFM swine diets with respect to energy, protein, fiber, ether extract or dry matter. Addition of 0.3% L-lysine monohydrochloride to SFM diets resulted in improved gain and gain per unit of feed fed. The results from a rat experiment were in general agreement with results from the swine experiment which showed that supplementation of SFM diets with lysine was essential for good animal performance.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science.

2 Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research Center.

3 Present address: Agricultural Research Center, Ona, Florida, 33865.

4 Department of Animal Science.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Animal Science.