J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1974. 38:463-466.
© 1974 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Christiansen, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, D. G.

Reconstituted Wheat. II. Influence of Physical Form on In Vitro Digestibility1, 2,

R. R. Christiansen3 and D. G. Wagner

Oklahoma State University,4 Stillwater 74074

Abstract

Three in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD) studies compared wheat reconstituted and processed in different forms with dry rolled wheat (DRW) and dry rolled sorghum (DRS). Wheat to be reconstituted was raised to 30% moisture and stored for 21 days. Reconstitution treatments compared with DRW and DRS in Experiment 1 were ground reconstituted wheat (GRW), rolled reconstituted wheat (RRW) and whole reconstituted wheat rolled just prior to in vitro digestion (WRRW). RRW, WRRW, DRW and DRS were compared in Experiment 2, and DRW, WRRW and whole reconstituted wheat with no further processing (WRW) before in vitro digestion were evaluated in Experiment 3. DRW, GRW and RRW, in Experiment 1, and DRW and RRW, in Experiment 2, were more completely digested than DRS and WRRW (P<.01). In Experiment 3, DRW was more completely digested (P<.05) than WRRW, with WRRW showing a higher (P<.01) IVDMD than WRW. In general, wheat which was dry rolled produced higher (P<.01) IVDMD than sorghum, but none of the reconstitution treatments improved the IVDMD of wheat over dry rolling.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article 2598 of the Agricultural Experiment Station, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater.

2 The assistance of I.T. Omtvedt in statistical analysis is gratefully acknowledged.

3 Present address: Roxbury, Kansas.

4 Department of Animal Sciences and Industry.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Society of Animal Science.