J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1973. 37:153-158.
© 1973 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Totusek, R.
Right arrow Articles by Whiteman, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Totusek, R.
Right arrow Articles by Whiteman, J. V.

Relation of Estimation Method, Sampling Interval and Milk Composition to Milk Yield of Beef Cows and Calf Gain1, 2,

Robert Totusek, Dudly W. Arnett3, G. L. Holland4 and J. V. Whiteman

Oklahoma State University,5 Stillwater 74074

Abstract

TWENTY-FOUR beef cows were maintained in drylot through three lactations to provide 36 complete 210-day lactations terminating with a weaned calf. Calves were separated from their dams at 10 days, allowed to nurse twice daily, and provided a maintenance allowance of supplemental ration from 112 to 210 days. Milk yield was estimated by weighing the calf before and after nursing (calf-weight-change) twice daily 6 days each week, and by milking one udder half while the calf nursed (hand-milking) twice 1 day per week. Sex-corrected calf weight at 210 days and daily gain to 70, 112 and 210 days were calculated. Milk was analyzed for fat and total solids.

Calf-weight-change estimates of milk yield were higher and less variable than hand-milking estimates at every stage of lactation; average daily milk yield estimated by calf-weight-change was 29% higher than the yield estimated by hand-milking, 5.85 vs. 4.54 kg, respectively, for 210 days.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper 1981 of the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Stillwater.

2 The assistance of J. B. Mickle, Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, in determination of milk constituents and R. D. Morrison, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, in statistical analysis and computer programming is gratefully acknowledged.

3 Present address: Garden City, Kansas.

4 Present address: Texas A & M University, San Angelo.

5 Department of Animal Sciences and Industry.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. E. Grings, A. J. Roberts, T. W. Geary, and M. D. MacNeil
Milk yield of primiparous beef cows from three calving systems and varied weaning ages
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2008; 86(3): 768 - 779.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. G. Jenkins and C. L. Ferrell
Preweaning efficiency for mature cows of breed crosses from tropically adapted Bos indicus and Bos taurus and unadapted Bos taurus breeds
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1876 - 1881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. H. Ciccioli, R. P. Wettemann, L. J. Spicer, C. A. Lents, F. J. White, and D. H. Keisler
Influence of body condition at calving and postpartum nutrition on endocrine function and reproductive performance of primiparous beef cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2003; 81(12): 3107 - 3120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Animal Science.