J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1973. 37:11-17.
© 1973 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Butts, W. T.

Evaluating Relationships among Immature Measures of Size, Shape and Performance of Beef Bulls. III. The Relationships between Post-Weaning Test Performance and Size and Shape at Twelve Months1, 2,

J. E. Brown3, C. J. Brown4 and W. T. Butts5

University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701 and U.S. Department of Agriculture, Knoxville, Tennessee

Abstract

TEN body measures, including weight, were taken on 267 Hereford (H) and 283 Angus (A) bulls at 12 months of age. The genetic and phenotypic correlations (rG and rP) between the individual measures and four feedlot traits including test gain, feed consumed (FCONS), feed conversion (FCONV) and final test weight (FWT) were discussed. The 10 body measures were also used in a principal components analysis for each breed group. The principal components explained the covariance structure among these 10 body measures and the various components provided a means of evaluating bulls according to size and shape. The rG and rP between several principal components from each group and the four feedlot traits were considered as measures of the relationship of size and shape to test performance.

The rG between individual measures at 12 months and measures of feedlot performance of H and A bulls in the feedlot were generally large and positive, with several of the A correlations being smaller than those of H bulls. The rG between body measures and FCONV were different for the groups. Genes with a positive effect on the body measures improved FCONV of H bulls but had an adverse effect on FCONV of A bulls. The rP were moderate, positive and very similar for all test traits except FCONV which were negative but sufficiently small to be of little use.


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 This study supported in part by a grant from Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.

3 Present address, Bovine International, Dallas, Texas.

4 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.

5 Animal Science Research Division, A.R.S., University of Tennessee, Knoxville.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Animal Science.