J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1973. 36:854-861.
© 1973 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benyshek, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marlowe, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Benyshek, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Marlowe, T. J.

Estimating Heritability of Hereford Cow Weights1, 2,

L. L. Benyshek3 and T. J. Marlowe

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg 24061

Abstract

Estimates were calculated from both adjusted and unadjusted weights of 1,584 cows in 17 representative Virginia Hereford herds. Adjusted weights were adjusted for year, herd, flesh condition, sire of cow, age, days postpartum and the interactions of year x age and year x condition. Variations of this basic model were used to analyze several subsets of the data, however, because the sires of some cows were unknown, there were repeat observations on some cows in two herds, some cows did not wean calves the years weights were taken or because of computer inability to handle the large number of sire groups.

Heritability estimates ranged from 0.52±.16 to 1.00±.16. The lowest h2 was obtained from an indirect method (Harvey, 1970 as modified by Bailey et al., 1971) based on the sire component of variance calculated from data set 3 consisting of 854 cows by 210 sires. This low estimate probably resulted from a poor estimate of the sire component of variance.


Footnotes

1 Published with approval of the Director of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Research Division.

2 The authors express their appreciation to the members of the Virginia BCIA who permitted them to use their cattle, facilities and records in this study.

3 This study was part of a thesis submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Comparisons of Angus, Charolais, Galloway, Hereford, Longhorn, Nellore, Piedmontese, Salers, and Shorthorn breeds for weight, weight adjusted for condition score, height, and condition score of cows
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(1): 74 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Genetic parameters for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score in beef cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3112 - 3122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck
Breed comparisons of Angus, Charolais, Hereford, Jersey, Limousin, Simmental, and South Devon for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score of cows
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3123 - 3132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
Y. H. Choy, J. S. Brinks, and R. M. Bourdon
Repeated-measure animal models to estimate genetic components of mature weight, hip height, and body condition score
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2002; 80(8): 2071 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Animal Science.