J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1973. 36:563-565.
© 1973 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Macpherson, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Macpherson, J. W.

A Comparison of Two Methods for Boar Semen Collection1

G. J. King and J. W. Macpherson

University of Guelph,2 Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Abstract

TWELVE Yorkshire boars (average age 12.2 months) were collected twice weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. One-half of the collections were made with an artificial vagina and the other half by the "gloved-hand" method. Ejaculation time, total semen volume, gel volume, gel free semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm per ejaculate and percent motility were measured. Analysis of the data indicated that more sperm per ejaculate were obtained with the "gloved-hand" method (P<0.05). Since there was no significant difference in semen volume, sperm concentration or any of the other characteristics between the two collection methods, the biological significance of this difference in total sperm is questioned. Results indicated that the "gloved-hand" method is satisfactory for routine collection of boar semen.

Boar semen may be collected using an articial vagina (Rudolfo, 1934; Aamdal and Hogset, 1956; Melrose and O'Hagan, 1959), or by the "gloved-hand" technique (Hancock and Hovell, 1959). The advantages of the latter method are simplicity, low cost and elimination of the need for cleaning and sterilization of equipment. However, the "gloved-hand" may not provide adequate stimulus for optimum sperm output. This project was undertaken to compare ejaculation time, semen volume, concentration and motility of boar semen obtained by these two methods and to determine whether the "gloved-hand" method is satisfactory for routine collection of boar semen.


Footnotes

1 This study was supported by grants from the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and the Ontario Association of Animal Breeders.

2 Department of Animal and Poultry Science.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
M. Zhang, H. Hong, B. Zhou, S. Jin, C. Wang, M. Fu, S. Wang, and G. Xia
The expression of atrial natriuretic peptide in the oviduct and its functions in pig spermatozoa.
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 189(3): 493 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Animal Science.