J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1973. 36:511-515.
© 1973 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kirton, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kirton, A. H.

Observations on the Contribution of Fat and Lean to the Aroma of Cooked Beef and Lamb

A. M. Pearson1, 3,, L. M. Wenham1, W. A. Carse1, K. McLeod1, C. L. Davey1 and A. H. Kirton2

Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand, P. O. Box 617, Hamilton, New Zealand and Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand

Abstract

USING triangle tests, both a trained and an untrained panel found it difficult to distinguish differences in aroma between heated lean extracts of beef and lamb. Either panel could readily (P<.001) distinguish the aroma of the lean extract heated in the presence of rendered fat from the same species from the aroma of the lean extract alone, but were unable to identify the species from which the fat originated. Comparison of rendered and ground whole beef fat with rendered or ground whole lamb fat revealed that the panel was frequently unable to recognize any difference between species in aroma and were equally poor in correctly identifying the kind of fat. Results suggest that the major species differences in aroma of heated lamb and beef do not arise from the lean extracts. Even though such differences appear to originate from the fatty tissues, they are extremely subtle and difficult to distinguish.


Footnotes

1 Meat Industry Research Institute of New Zealand (Inc.), P.O. Box 617, Hamilton, New Zealand.

2 Ruakura Agricultural Research Centre, Private Bag, Hamilton, New Zealand.

3 The senior author was on sabbatic leave from the Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48823. He acknowledges the financial assistance provided by a Fulbright-Hays Senior Research Fellowship during the duration of this study.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Society of Animal Science.