J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1972. 35:1275-1279.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stormont, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stormont, C.

The Role of Maternal Effects in Animal Breeding: I. Passive Immunity in Newborn Animals1, 2, 3,

Clyde Stormont

University of California, Davis 95616

Abstract

The Why of Passive Immunity

WHY is it that newborn animals require a supply of gamma globulin passively acquired from their maternal parent? Certainly it is not that they cannot make their own antibodies; indeed, many can. Studies in recent years have shown that developing fetuses can make antibodies to numerous antigens but, in the isolation of their essentially germ-free environment, they rarely come in contact with foreign antigens. The fetal lamb when exposed to various antigens first makes antibodies to bacteriophage {varphi}174, later to ferritin and hemocyanin, and still later to ovalbumin but not at all to diptheria toxoid (Sterzl and Silverstein, 1967). Those studies and comparable studies on embryonating chicks (Brambell, 1970) demonstrate that immunological competence does not arise simultaneously for all antigens. Moreover, competence continues to mature post-term, and it becomes greatly enhanced by multiple contacts with literally hundreds of different antigens.

Thus, the logical inference is that passive immunity is required because the


Footnotes

1 Presented at a symposium on The Role of Maternal Effects in Animal Breeding sponsored by the American Society of Animal Science, August 3, 1971, University of California, Davis.

2 The author is particularly indebted to L. A. Hanson and B. G. Johansson for their well documented account of immunological studies of milk. Their report saved countless hours of searching the literature for materials for the present report. The same, of course, applies to Brambell's monograph.

3 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
B. Ask, E. H. van der Waaij, E. J. Glass, and S. C. Bishop
Modeling Immunocompetence Development and Immunoresponsiveness to Challenge in Chicks
Poult. Sci., July 1, 2007; 86(7): 1336 - 1350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.