J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J. Anim Sci. 1972. 35:859-864.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chicco, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ammerman, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chicco, C. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ammerman, C. B.

Molasses-Urea for Restricted Forage Fed Steers in the Tropics

C. F. Chicco1, T. A. Shultz2, Elena Shultz3, A. A. Carnevali1 and C. B. Ammerman4

Centro de Investigaciones Agronómicas, Maracay, Venezuela

Abstract

A FACTORIAL experiment was conducted with 36 crossbred Brahman x Criollo steers to evaluate the effects of three levels of forage intake (50, 75 and 100% of ad libitum intake) with and without molasses-urea supplementation (3 kg of molasses + 150 g urea/animal/day).

Restricting forage intake decreased weight gains (P<.01) while supplementation improved (P<.01) gains at all forage intake levels. Forage consumption was not affected by supplementation. The overall effect of forage intake and supplementation on organic matter digestibility was not significant, though when individual means were compared, lower (P<.05) digestibility occurred at the 50% of ad libitum forage intake level and was improved (P<.05) by supplementation at the 75 and 50% of ad libitum levels of forage consumption. A similar trend was observed for cellulose digestion. Nitrogen retention decreased with the restriction of forage intake while supplementation improved (P<.05) this at all forage consumption levels.

Higher blood urea levels with restricted forage intake were associated with the molasses-urea supplementation (P<.01). Rumen ammonia was increased (P<.05) by supplementation at the 50% of ad libitum forage consumption level. Rumen microbial nitrogen declined by (P<.01) restricting forage intake while supplementation increased (P<.01) these values at all levels of consumption. Supplementation improved (P<.05) rumen cellulose digestion at the 75 and 50% of ad libitum forage intake level. Restricting forage intake decreased (P<.01) individual and total volatile fatty acids while supplementation increased (P<.01) these with the effect being greater at the 50% of ad libitum forage consumption level.

Footnotes

1 Centre Investigaciones Agronomicas, Ministerio Agricultura y Cria, Maracay-Venezuela.

2 Facultad Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Central Maracay-Venezuela.

3 Centro Investigaciones Veterinarias, Ministerio Agricultura y Cria. Maracay-Venezuela.

4 Animal Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.