J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1972. 34:960-962.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dikeman, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dikeman, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Allen, D. M.

Evaluation of the Tenderometer for Predicting Bovine Muscle Tenderness1, 2,

M. E. Dikeman3, H. J. Tuma3, H. A. Glimp4, K. E. Gregory4 and D. M. Allen3

Kansas State University, Manhattan 66502 and U.S. Department of Agriculture

Abstract

The Tenderometer was evaluated as an objective method of predicting beef tenderness. Sixty Hereford and 60 Angus male calves in six different treatment groups were fed in a commercial feedlot and slaughtered in a commercial packing plant. The longissimus muscle was probed with the Tenderometer and seventh and eighth rib steaks were evaluated for tenderness by a taste panel and the Warner-Bratzler shear. Least-squares means for Tenderometer values within breed and breed-treatment subclasses were not consistent with means for shear values or with taste panel data. Although correlations of Tenderometer values with shear and taste panel scores were significant (P<.05), they were low (r=0.29 and –.30, respectively).

The Tenderometer is simple to operate and would be practical and useful for predicting tenderness if it could be proved to have a high correlation with Warner-Bratzler shear values and taste panel tenderness scores of cooked muscle. With the population in this study, it accounted for only 10% of the variation in tenderness.


Footnotes

1 Contribution No. 419. Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Manhattan 66502.

2 The Tenderometer provided by Armour and Company, Oak Brook, Illinois.

3 Department of Animal Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66502.

4 U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, Nebraska, Animal Science Research Division, A.R.S., U.S.D.A.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. W. Stephens, J. A. Unruh, M. E. Dikeman, M. C. Hunt, T. E. Lawrence, and T. M. Loughin
Mechanical probes can predict tenderness of cooked beef longissimus using uncooked measurements
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 2077 - 2086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. R. Timm, J. A. Unruh, M. E. Dikeman, M. C. Hunt, T. E. Lawrence, J. E. Boyer Jr., and J. L. Marsden
Mechanical measures of uncooked beef longissimus muscle can predict sensory panel tenderness and Warner-Bratzler shear force of cooked steaks
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2003; 81(7): 1721 - 1727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.