J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1972. 34:713-725.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ercanbrack, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ercanbrack, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Price, D. A.

Selecting for Weight and Rate of Gain in Noninbred Lambs

S. K. Ercanbrack and D. A. Price

U.S. Department of Agriculture,1 Dubois, Idaho 83423

Abstract

Eight hundred and seven crossbred, 502 Rambouillet, 703 Targhee and 516 Columbia ewe lambs were weighed at birth in April, weaning in August and at approximately monthly intervals thereafter through shearing in May. Postweaning gains were calculated for feeding periods from October through December on mature, dry, fall range forage and for January through April on high quality alfalfa hay pellets. Gains were almost negligible in the October through December period but averaged about 0.09 kg per day during the later period. Distinct trends were evident in magnitudes of heritabilities and correlations involving body weights. Heritabilities tended to increase with time from weaning. Both genetic and phenotypic correlations tended to decrease with time between observations on correlated variables. Heritabilities of gain under a good nutritive environment were typically at least double those under the less favorable environment during October through December. Genetic variation in gains was distinctly higher under the better environment. Indices, incorporating various practical selection criteria, were calculated which would lead to the maximum rate of progress in improving weaning and yearling weights and postweaning gains. The data showed no evidence of serious genetic antagonisms among weights and gains.


Footnotes

1 From the U.S. Sheep Experiment Station, Sheep and Fur Animal Research Branch, Animal Science Research Division, A.R.S., Dubois, Idaho in cooperation with the University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.