J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1972. 34:709-712.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sherritt, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Partenheimer, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sherritt, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Partenheimer, E. J.

A Swine Production System Based on the Use of One Pen from Birth to Marketing1, 2,

G. W. Sherritt, D. E. Orr, Jr.3, J. L. Gobble, V. E. Hazlett, R. A. Aldrich and E. J. Partenheimer

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park 16802

Abstract

A farrow-to-finish system in which pigs were raised from birth to market in the same pen was compared with a conventional system in which pigs were moved twice and mixed with pigs from other litters for a finishing period. The pigs in the conventional system were farrowed in one pen, moved to a second pen in another wing of the barn for a growing period and mixed with pigs from other litters and grown out to market weight in a third pen. There were four trials or farrowing periods with a total of 78 litters being raised in the farrow-to-finish system and 85 litters in the conventional system.

The pigs raised in the farrow-to-finish system grew slower during the finishing period and took longer to reach market weight than pigs grown in the conventional system. A farrow-to-finish system requires closer scheduling of breeding than is possible with one herd and breeding to farrow in one unit.


Footnotes

1 Approved by the Director, The Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station, No. 4068 of the Journal Series.

2 The authors extend their appreciation for the support of this research by Agway, Inc., Syracuse, New York and by Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.

3 Present address: Department of Animal Husbandry, Michigan State University, East Lansing.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.