J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1972. 34:302-309.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carson, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Amann, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carson, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Amann, R. P.

The Male Rabbit. VI. Effects of Ejaculation and Season on Testicular Size and Function1

W. S. Carson and R. P. Amann

The Pennsylvania State University2, University Park 16802

Abstract

QUANTITATIVE studies of testicular histology for bulls, rams and rabbits ejaculated less frequently than once daily were summarized by Amann (1970). He concluded that there was no evidence to support the concept that ejaculation altered the rate of sperm production. However, frequently copulating male rats were found to have heavier accessory reproductive organs than sexually rested males (Drori and Folman, 1964; Folman and Drori, 1966; Herz, Folman and Drori, 1969) although testicular weight was not significantly different. Lambiase and Amann (1969) found no significant differences in paired testicular weight for rabbits collected twice every other day as compared to sexually rested rabbits. Nevertheless, it is possible that the frequency of ejaculation or the duration of treatment in their experiments was insufficient to elicit testicular responses. Amann (unpublished) found the mean paired testicular weight for 27 rabbits ejaculated once daily for 11 to 21 days was heavier (P <.05) than that for sexually rested litter-mates (6.65 vs. 5.17 g).


Footnotes

1 Authorized for publication on 6-16-71 as Paper No. 4001 in the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station. This investigation was supported by Research Grant HD-01356-06 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The authors are indebted to F. M. Abel, G. J. Killian and J. T. Lambiase, Jr. for technical assistance and to Dr. G. L. Hargrove for aid in the statistical analyses.

2 Dairy Breeding Research Center, Department of Dairy Science.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.