J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1972. 34:37-41.
© 1972 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashmore, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Doerr, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashmore, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Doerr, L.

Postnatal Development of Muscle Fiber Types in Domestic Animals1

C. R. Ashmore, G. Tompkins and L. Doerr2

University of California, Davis ,3 95616

Abstract

Histochemical evaluation of muscles from piglets, lambs and calves allows the conclusion that in these species, as was previously reported for chick muscle (Ashmore and Doerr, 1971), there are two basic muscle fiber types. These have been termed a and ß based on myosin ATPase activity. Initially, a fibers are "red", but have the capacity to transform from an aerobic state of metabolism (aR) to an anerobic state (aW). ß fibers remain "red" throughout their lifespan. Transformation is primarily concerned with changes in energy-producing enzymes, and is accompanied by a rapid increase in fiber size. The majority of muscle fibers are a. Since the number of fibers in a muscle is relatively fixed at birth, it is suggested that increasing degree of muscularity in domestic animals is achieved by practices which favor transformation of aR fibers to aW fibers. Selection of heavily muscled animals for breeding stock, and progressive elimination of requirements which utilize sustained muscular activity could be examples of such practices.


Footnotes

1 Supported in part by Public Health Service Grant FR-06138, HSAA and by Critical Research Fund, Agr. Exp. Sta., Univ. of Calif.

2 Postdoctoral Trainee, Public Health Service Grant FR-06138, HSAA.

3 Laboratory of Muscle Biology. Department of Animal Science. Technical assistance of H. Stokes and W. Castleman are gratefully acknowledged.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
K. Wimmers, N. T. Ngu, D. G. J. Jennen, D. Tesfaye, E. Murani, K. Schellander, and S. Ponsuksili
Relationship between myosin heavy chain isoform expression and muscling in several diverse pig breeds
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(4): 795 - 803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Society of Animal Science.