J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 33:472-475.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welch, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Welch, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, A. M.

Effect of Beet Pulp and Citrus Pulp on Rumination Activity

J. G. Welch and A. M. Smith1

University of Vermont, Burlington 05401,2, 3,

Abstract

Conclusions: Five experiments were conducted to investigate the effect on rumination activity in sheep and cattle when fed beet pulp, citrus pulp, and alfalfa meal pellets, compared to chopped or long hay. All three materials reduced the amount of rumination time. The beet pulp had a similar concentration of cell wall constituents (CWC) as the hay, but caused the least rumination. Citrus pulp produced less rumination but the time per unit of CWC was similar to that produced by the hay. The finely ground alfalfa meal (pelleted) produced rumination times lower than those observed during the citrus pulp feeding, although the alfalfa meal had approximately twice the CWC content. Previous studies have shown a high correlation between CWC content of long or chopped forages and rumination time. The citrus pulp results agree with what would be expected from a roughage material having a low CWC content and large particle size. The alfalfa meal pellets produced rumen contents that were too fine to require very much rumination for passage through the reticuloomasal orifice.


Footnotes

1 Acknowledgment is made to William H. Reese and Barbara Knight without whose capable assistance this work would not have been accomplished.

2 University of Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Article No. 246.

3 Supported in part by U.S.D.A. Regional Research Project NE-24.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.