J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:77-79.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Welch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wideman, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Welch, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wideman, D.

Discussion

J. A. Welch, W. D. Foote, G. B. Marion, W. Sybesma, T. G. Dunn, R. Short, L. E. Casida and D. Wideman

Abstract

Question: Welch

On the last paper, about three slides from the end, where you had a 24-day interval, what was the standard deviation, was it 2.29 or 22.9?

Foote: When the interval was 24 days, the standard deviation was 3.5 on this particular group, a treated group.

Question: Marion

Did you have an opportunity to determine whether the success of the first insemination postpartum, which was very early, might have been influenced by the side of ovulation, that is, was it possible to determine when you had a successful insemination, on which side the ovulation had occurred, and which hom was carrying this pregnancy and if this may have been associated with the success?

Casida: The question is complex because of the greater tendency for ovulation to be on the previously nonpregnant side when ovulation is early. As I recall, there was a difference in favor of the nonpregnant side at a similar short interval postpartum.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.