J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:1164-1168.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by De Jesus, M.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by De Jesus, M.-L.

Urea Metabolism in Sulfate-Deprived and Sulfate-Supplemented Rats

R. Glenn Brown1, Athena Macris-Hagerty2, Eileen P. Liddy2 and Maria-Luisa De Jesus2

University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada and Drexel Institute of Technology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Abstract

The influence of sulfate-deprivation and supplementation on urea excretion, in vitro synthesis of urea as well as the response of the rat to high-protein stress was studied. Sulfate-deprivation resulted in a significant decrease in urea excretion during the fourth and seventh weeks. During this time there were no differences in fecal nitrogen excretion but there were significant decreases in urinary nitrogen levels which suggested retention of nitrogen. Because there were no significant differences in weight gains between the two diet groups, the observed retention of nitrogen was probably transient, perhaps as glutamine or a similar urea precursor. Decreased urea excretion during the critical times appeared to be due to a lack of capacity of the sulfate-deprived animal to synthesize urea as measured indirectly by the inability of sulfate-deprived animals to respond as readily to high-protein challenge or directly in an in vitro system. An hypothesis was presented to explain these findings.


Footnotes

1 Department of Animal Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

2 Department of Nutrition and Food. Drexel Institute of Technology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.