J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:859-862.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glimp, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Glimp, H. A.

Effects of Sex Alteration, Breed, Type of Rearing and Creep Feeding on Lamb Growth

Hudson A. Glimp1

U. S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, Nebraska 68933

Abstract

Eight hundred and seventy-three lambs from seven breeds were used in a study to determine the effects of sex alteration, breed, type of rearing and creep feeding on lamb growth. Rams, rams implanted with 3 mg DES and short scrotum lambs had heavier weaning weights and higher weights per day of age at weaning than wethers. Rams implanted with DES were not different from non-implanted intact rams in the growth and carcass traits measured in this study. Significant (P<.001) breed-sex treatment interactions were observed for weight per day of age at slaughter and carcass grade. Intact rams, rams implanted with 3 mg DES and short scrotum rams gained faster than wethers in all breeds except the purebred Targhee and Navajo. With the exception of the higher carcass grade for Coarse Wool ram lambs, wethers and short scrotum males had higher carcass grades than intact rams and rams implanted with DES.

Type of rearing had more effect on pre-weaning growth than type of birth, with little compensatory post-weaning growth response to compensate for pre-weaning differences. Creep feeding had no effect on lamb gains, due primarily to the limited feed intake.


Footnotes

1 U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Animal Science Research Division, A.R.S.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.