J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:832-839.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitzhugh, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fitzhugh, H. A., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Cartwright, T. C.

Variation in Postweaning Weight Gains of Steers Independent of Appetite

H. A. Fitzhugh, Jr. and T. C. Cartwright1

Texas A&M University, College Station 77843

Abstract

A total of 87 Hereford steers, including 18 paternal half-sib groups, were individually fed a standard ground ration in eight trials. Each trial lasted 32 weeks. Daily feed allotments were restricted to the expected minimum consumption of any contemporary steer. The mean weekly feed consumption was 47.2 kg when a phenotypic CV of 1.7%. The mean weekly weight gain was 5.1 kg with a phenotypic CV of 9%. Since variation in feed consumption among contemporary steers was essentially eliminated by the experimental feeding procedure, variation in weight gain provided direct evidence of differences in intrinsic efficiency of feed utilization for growth and maintenance. Variation among paternal half-sib groups for average weekly gain was significant (P<.05), suggesting that additive genetic variation existed for efficiency of feed utilization.


Footnotes

1 Experimental data were collected by D. E. Book, W. E. Kruse and other personnel of the Texas A & M Research Center at McGregor. Dr. St. C. S. Taylor, A.R.C. Animal Breeding Research Org., Edinburgh provided many valuable suggestions for the analysis and interpretation of this experiment.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.