J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:549-553.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kromann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kromann, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sharp, J. E.

Group Feeding vs. Individual Feeding of Lambs1

R. P. Kromann2, M. D. Finkner3 and J. E. Sharp4

Shell Development Company, Modesto, California,5

Abstract

Variation in lamb growth experiments was studied with 24 individually-fed and 48 group-fed wether lambs ( 16 groups of three). The variables ( method of feeding, energy level and environment) were studied in a 23 factorial experiment. The two methods of feeding were individual and groups of three. The two energy levels were a high-energy and a low-energy ration. The two environments consisted of an open and a semi-closed barn. The group-fed lambs had a greater rate of gain and energy gain than those fed individually. The greater energy gain was due to a greater growth response and a heavier final weight, since there were no differences in percent body protein or fat. The group-fed lambs consumed more dry matter than the individually-fed lambs; however, there were no differences in the NEM+P of the ration. The lambs fed the high-energy ration had a greater growth response, energy gain and NEM+P of the ration than those fed the low-energy ration. The Iambs fed the high-energy ration in the semi-closed barn had a greater carcass fat content than those fed in the open barn whereas the lambs fed the low-energy ration in the open barn had a greater carcass fat content than those fed in the closed barn. The advantages of using individually-fed lambs in nutritional and biological research were discussed.


Footnotes

1 Journal Article MP 104, Biological Science Research Center, Shell Development Company, Modesto, California.

2 Present address: Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman.

3 Department of Experimental Statistics, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces.

4 The authors express their appreciation to S. R. Wagoner for his valuable technical assistance.

5 Health and Nutrition Division.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. D. Snowder and L. D. Van Vleck
Estimates of genetic parameters and selection strategies to improve the economic efficiency of postweaning growth in lambs
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2003; 81(11): 2704 - 2713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.