J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:167-173.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lee, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Henderson, C. R.

Effect of Cow Culling on Repeatability Estimates

A. J. Lee1 and C. R. Henderson

Cornell University, Ithaca 14850

Abstract

In the use of simplified selection index procedures to evaluate cows on their milk yielding ability, it is assumed that repeatability and the variance of records are constant for all herds and lactations. New York DHIA records on grade and purebred Holstein cows were used to examine the validity of these assumptions, the effect of cow culling on estimation of the repeatability and the variance of records, and the practical effects of apparent violation of assumptions and biases in estimation on cow evaluation procedures. Though a slight heterogeneity across herds of both intraherd regressions of a later on an earlier record and the within herd variances of records was found, in view of the large sampling errors, it would not be practical to use separate variance and repeatability estimates for each herd. The large range in pooled intraherd regressions of a later on an earlier lactation record and in pooled within herd variances for different lactations was almost completely accounted for by the effects of cow culling on milk yield. After adjustment for the effects of cow culling, the within herd variance of milk yield records was ten percent smaller in first than in later lactations while the within herd covariances were remarkably similar. It is concluded that unbiased estimation of the repeatability and variance of milk yield records must take into account the effects of cow culling. Considering different variances and covariances for different lactations after adjustment for the effects of cow culling instead of assuming homogeneous variances and constant repeatability resulted in only slight changes in selection index weights and accuracy. The simplified selection index procedure of weighting the average of n milk yield records on a cow by nr/(1+(n–1)r) where repeatability, r, is in the range of .55 to .60 is recommended for the within herd evaluation of cows on their milk yielding ability or future production.


Footnotes

1 Present address: Animal Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.