J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:43-50.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hourihan, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Terrill, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hourihan, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Terrill, C. E.

Comparison of Methods of Measuring Crimp in Grease Wool Staples1

Mary E. Hourihan2, Walter R. Harvey3 and Clair E. Terrill2

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Md. 20705

Abstract

Information was obtained on measurement of crimp in grease wool staples, using duplicate samples from two locks from three regions on Merino and Shropshire sheep. The study was designed to obtain information on lock differences and operator differences, and to compare three methods of measuring crimp.The number of crimps per centimeter was obtained by three methods: (1) placing a ruler alongside the staple and counting the crimps; (2) projecting and drawing the crimps, with subsequent measurement of width and depth and calculation of number of crimps per centimeter and width/depth ratio; and (3) projecting and measuring the crimps with a crimp scale to obtain width/depth ratio and number of crimps per centimeter.

Analyses of the results obtained by all three methods for the two breeds indicated that the different methods were fairly consistent in ranking regions on the sheep, levels on the lock and sheep for width/depth ratio and number of crimps per centimeter. To measure width/depth ratio of crimp, more than one location, level and subsample should be used for individual sheep.


Footnotes

1 The authors wish to acknowledge the help of B. F. Gadsden, Jr., who carried out the bulk of the experimental measurements, and Ruel L. Wilson for assistance in the final analyses of the data.

2 Animal Science Research Division, A.R.S., Beltsville, Maryland 2O7O5.

3 Formerly Biometrician, Livestock Research Staff, B.S.S., A.R.S., Beltsville, Maryland. Present address, Department of Dairy Science, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.