J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1971. 32:10-16.
© 1971 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahlschwede, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, O. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ahlschwede, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, O. W.

Prenatal and Postnatal Influences on Growth and Backfat in Swine1, 2,

W. T. Ahlschwede3 and O. W. Robison

North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27607

Abstract

AN understanding of the relationship between direct genetic effects and postnatal maternal effects is essential in formulation of optimum breeding programs for traits affected by maternal influences. In most mammals maternal effects are held to be an important component of performance. However, in swine, few studies have been reported concerning the relative importance of maternal effects or the relationships between maternal effects and other factors affecting performance. Cox and Willham (1962) reported important postnatal maternal influences on pig weight up to 98 days of age. Dickerson (1947) and Dickerson and Grimes (1947) have suggested a negative genetic correlation between "fattening ability" and postnatal maternal performance in swine. Several workers, e.g., Butler and Metrakos (1950) and Cox, Legates and Cockerham (1959), have reported important postnatal maternal influences on growth in mice.

The study of maternal effects is complicated because a dam transmits a sample half of her genes to her young, and her genotype is also expressed in the prenatal and postnatal circumstances which influence the young.


Footnotes

1 Paper No. 3137 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh.

2 Computing services for the investigation were supported by Public Health Services Grant FR-00011.

3 Present address: Genetics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Society of Animal Science.