J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1970. 31:828-836.
© 1970 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bereskin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bereskin, B.
Right arrow Articles by Norton, H. W.

Monte Carlo Studies of Selection and Inbreeding in Swine. III. Gene Frequency1

B. Bereskin2, C. E. Shelby2, L. N. Hazel3 and H. W. Norton4

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Iowa State University, Ames, and University of Illinois, Urbana

Abstract

These findings clearly demonstrate that although selection was based on an index of phenotypic values computed from the entire genome, independent loci responded separately with changes in gene frequency. This response depended on selection pressure, initial gene frequency, model of gene action and effective population number. For example, at loci controlled by the additive model, gene frequency of the favored allele rose quickly, with larger increases in the larger-sized lines. A similar trend was noted at loci under control of dominance models. Where the overdominance models prevailed and selection was operative, gene frequency of 0.5 was maintained. At other loci where more complicated models were employed, gene frequency changes were more subtle, depending on the various factors enumerated.

Significant differences were noted among replicates of each population in regressions of gene frequency on generation number, for each section of the genome. Clearly demonstrated was the low predictability of changes in gene frequency for a particular small segment of a population over a period of only a few generations.


Footnotes

1 Appreciation is expressed to Professors J. L. Lush and A. W. Nordskog of Iowa State University, Ames, and L. A. Swiger of Ohio State University, Columbus, for useful suggestations on the manuscript.

2 A.S.R.D., A.R.S., U.S.D.A., Beltsville, Maryland 20705.

3 Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames.

4 Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Written CommunicationHome page
S. CROWLEY
Linguistics and Composition Instruction: 1950-1980
Written Communication, October 1, 1989; 6(4): 480 - 505.
[Abstract]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Animal Science.