J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1970. 31:588-592.
© 1970 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, C. F.

Response of Fattening Ewe Lambs to Oral Melengestrol Acetate1, 2,

C. A. O'Brien3 and C. F. Miller4

Texas Tech University, Lubbock

Abstract

Ewe lambs fed melengestrol acetate at daily levels of 0.04, 0.08, and 0.16 mg made less gains than control lambs, however, the 0.24 mg MGA-treated groups gained more (0.14 vs. 0.13 kg daily) than controls. Treated lambs required more feed per unit of gain in trial I, but in trial II, the reverse occurred and control lambs utilized more feed per unit gain. Treated lambs consumed less feed than controls in both trials. Carcass grade, dressing percent and fleece production were unaffected by MGA.

The effect of MGA on genitalia was more pronounced, although uterine weights were not affected. In the treated lambs, cervical weights were significantly (P<.01) larger, ovarian weights were smaller, ovaries had fewer follicles but not a lesser number of large follicles, and the number of corpora lutea were present in infinitely small numbers in one trial and absent in the other. The data on corpora lutea suggest that lambs at 30 kg body weight are prepuberal. From these data it appears that MGA may have exerted an inhibitory influence on both follicle development and ripening, and suppressed the development of corpora lutea, or that lambs, unlike heifers, may have failed to respond because of a species difference.


Footnotes

1 This research was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, Michigan.

2 Contribution No. 33, International Center for Arid and Semi-Arid Land Studies.

3 Department of Animal Science.

4 Present address: College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Animal Science.