J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1970. 31:364-372.
© 1970 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goatcher, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goatcher, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Church, D. C.

Taste Responses in Ruminants. III. Reactions of Pygmy Goats, Normal Goats, Sheep and Cattle to Sucrose and Sodium Chloride1

W. D. Goatcher and D. C. Church

Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station, Corvallis2

Abstract

This study involved the use of the two-choice preference test to determine the taste responses of eight, each, of pygmy goats, normal goats, sheep and cattle to ascending concentrations of sucrose (Suc) and sodium chloride (NaCl). In addition, sheep and cattle were tested at 2.08 and 8.33% molasses concentrations.

Each animal was individually penned and fed to appetite on a nutritionally adequate diet. Responses were expressed on the basis of percent of total fluid intake comprised by test solution.

Response trends were analyzed by stepwise multiple linear regression. A 95% confidence interval was established for a theoretical mean intake of 50%. The upper confidence limit was at 60% intake and the lower was at 40% intake. They were termed, respectively, upper discrimination threshold (UDT) and lower discrimination threshold (LDT). The rejection threshold (RET) was set at 20% intake and the preference threshold (PRT) at 80% intake. Ascending or descending responses at the various threshold concentrations are identified by {uparrow} and {downarrow}, respectively.

Molar concentrations at the thresholds crossed by responses of the species studied were, for pygmies, Suc—UDT: .055{uparrow} and .53{downarrow}; NaCl—UDT: .024{uparrow} and .21{downarrow}, PRT: .10{uparrow} and .14{downarrow}, LDT: .36{downarrow}, RET: .60{downarrow},, for normals, Suc—UDT: .033{uparrow}, PRT: .38{uparrow}; NaCl—UDT: .027{uparrow}{downarrow}, LDT: .15{downarrow}, RET: .55{downarrow}, for sheep, Suc—LDT: .41{downarrow}; NaCl—LDT: .21{downarrow}, RET: .53{downarrow}, and for cattle, Suc—UDT: .025{uparrow} and .41{downarrow}, PRT: .058{uparrow} and .24{downarrow}, LDT: .56{downarrow}; NaCl—LDT: .016{downarrow}, RET: 14{downarrow}.

Sheep were indifferent to 2.08 and 8.33% molasses concentrations. Cattle demonstrated strong preference responses to the 2.08% level and weak preference reactions to the 8.33% level.


Footnotes

1 Technical Paper No. 2801, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Department of Animal Science.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Sporndly and T. Asberg
Eating rate and preference of different concentrate components for cattle.
J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2006; 89(6): 2188 - 2199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Animal Science.