HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dickerson, G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dickerson, G.

Efficiency of Animal Production—Molding the Biological Components¹

U. S. Meat Animal Research Center, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Clay Center, Nebraska

Abstract

Major biological objectives in reducing production costs per unit of animal product value seem to be (1) greater total product value per female (e.g., milk, wool, eggs) relative to metabolic body size, (2) higher rate of reproduction, especially in cattle and sheep, to reduce breeding herd costs per meat animal marketed, (3) more efficient lean growth to market live weight and earlier sexual maturity, with minimum increase in mature size of females, especially in cattle, and (4) combining female (milk or wool) production and progeny lean meat production under intensive management.

Changes in management systems and in product values will modify specific biological objectives and hence need to be anticipated as well as possible. Breeding programs need balanced emphasis on (1) evaluation and utilization of existing breed differences in commercial livestock production, and (2) continuing genetic improvement within the pure breeds or strains.

¹ Invited paper presented before the Breeding and Genetics Section of the 61st Annual Meeting of the American Society of Animal Science at Purdue University, August 1969.

² Animal Husbandry Research Division, A.R.S., U.S.D.A., Marvel Baker Hall, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Cammack, M. G. Thomas, and R. M. Enns Review: Reproductive Traits and Their Heritabilities in Beef Cattle Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 517 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Calegare, M. M. Alencar, I. U. Packer, P. R. Leme, C. L. Ferrell, and D. P. D. Lanna Preweaning performance and body composition of calves from straightbred Nellore and Bos taurus x Nellore crosses J Anim Sci, May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1814 - 1820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Calegare, M. M. Alencar, I. U. Packer, C. L. Ferrell, and D. P. D. Lanna Cow/calf preweaning efficiency of Nellore and Bos taurus x Bos indicus crosses J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 740 - 747. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Green ASAS Centennial Paper: Future needs in animal breeding and genetics J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Allan, L. A. Kuehn, R. A. Cushman, W. M. Snelling, S. E. Echternkamp, and R. M. Thallman Confirmation of quantitative trait loci using a low-density single nucleotide polymorphism map for twinning and ovulation rate on bovine chromosome 5 J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 46 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. MacNeil, T. W. Geary, G. A. Perry, A. J. Roberts, and L. J. Alexander Genetic partitioning of variation in ovulatory follicle size and probability of pregnancy in beef cattle J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1646 - 1650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Martinez, R. M. Koch, L. V. Cundiff, K. E. Gregory, and L. D. Van Vleck Number of calves born, number of calves weaned, and cumulative weaning weight as measures of lifetime production for Hereford cows J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 1903 - 1911. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Arango, L. V. Cundiff, and L. D. Van Vleck Genetic parameters for weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height, and body condition score in beef cows J Anim Sci, December 1, 2002; 80(12): 3112 - 3122. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]