J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1970. 30:1005-1011.
© 1970 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mellenberger, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mellenberger, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. J.

An in vitro Technique for Estimating Digestibility of Treated and Untreated Wood1,2,

R. W. Mellenberger3, L. D. Satter4, M. A. Millett4 and A. J. Baker4

University of Wisconsin and U.S. Department of Agriculture

Abstract

In the United States, about 50 million tons of wood and bark residues, containing up to 75% carbohydrate are available annually as a potential energy source for ruminants. Except for modest digestibility of a few hardwood species, however, the carbohydrates of whole-wood residues are essentially unavailable to the ruminant animal. The close molecular association between the major constituents of wood—cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin—appears to limit bacterial and enzymatic access to the carbohydrates of the cell wall.

Success in using wood residue carbohydrates as an energy source thus requires the development of an effective and practical means for enhancing the accessibility of the cell wall constituents to the action of rumen microorganisms. Of prime importance to this type of undertaking is a rapid, accurate, and inexpensive in vitro technique for assaying the large numbers of samples that will be generated.

The in vitro procedure of Tilley and Terry (1963) or one of its modifications has been used extensively and is one of the better laboratory methods for evaluating the nutritive quality of forages (Barnes, 1967; Oh, Baumgardt and Scholl, 1966; Van Soest, Wine and Moore, 1966).


Footnotes

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Acknowledgment is made to the Graduate School Research Committee, University of Wisconsin, Madison, and to the Tennessee Valley Authority, Division of Forestry Development, Norris, Tennessee for cooperation and support in this work.

3 Department of Dairy Science.

4 Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service. The Laboratory is maintained at Madison (N. Walnut Street, 53705) in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Animal Science.