J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1970. 30:36-39.
© 1970 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rust, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vetter, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rust, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Vetter, R. L.

M. Longissimus Area of Lamb Carcasses—A Comparison of Four Measurement Techniques and the Evaluation of Operator Differences1, 2,

R. E. Rust, D. G. Olson, D. D. Kratzer3, R. O. Schuler4 and R. L. Vetter

Iowa State University, Ames

Abstract

The cross-sectional area of the longissimus is frequently used as a measure of carcass lean or an expression of carcass desirability. Ament, Galgan and Rupnow (1962) reported a correlation of 0.8 between longissimus area and carcass lean in lamb carcasses. Field, Kemp and Varney (1963); Latham, Moody and Kemp (1966) and Smith and Galgan (1964) used the longissimus area as a variable in prediction equations of carcass lean and the yield of retail salable meat.

Thus, it is important that longissimus area be measured accurately and rapidly so that large numbers of carcasses can be evaluated. Longissimus area has traditionally been measured from a tracing with a compensating polar planimeter or by superimposing a grid over the tracing as reported by Bodwell, Harrington and Pomeroy (1959) and Henderson et al. (1966). A photographic method of measuring the longissimus area was introduced by Schoonover and Stratton (1957) who suggested that this method was subject to less operator error.


Footnotes

1 Journal Paper No. J-6193 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 1566.

2 Cooperation of Wilson and Company, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, is gratefully acknowledged.

3 Departments of Animal Sciences and Statistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

4 Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the American Society of Animal Science.