HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lohman, T. G. Articles by Norton, H. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lohman, T. G. Articles by Norton, H. W.

Biological and Technical Sources of Variability in Bovine Carcass Lean Tissue Composition II. Biological Variation in Potassium, Nitrogen and Water¹

University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

The use of whole-body K, N and H₂O as quantitative indices of the fat-free body is based on the assumption that each of these constituents is maintained in a relatively constant concentration in the fat-free body. Two further assumptions—that each of these constituents is found predominantly within the lean muscle mass in a relatively constant amount and that amounts found outside this tissue vary in proportion to amounts found within the lean—lead to the conclusion that body K, N and H₂O are also indices of lean muscle mass. Much chemical data has been reported emphasizing muscle-to-muscle and tissue-to-tissue differences in potassium content as important sources of error in predicting body composition from ⁴⁰K. However, it is not necessary for K, N or H₂O contents to be the same in each tissue of the fat-free body, or each muscle of the lean muscle mass, for the whole-body constituents to be valuable measures of the fat-free body or of lean muscle mass.

¹ Supported jointly by funds from the U.S.D.A. and the Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois.

² Department of Animal Science.

³ Idaho Falls, Idaho.