J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1944. 3:201-212.
© 1944 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickerson, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hazel, L. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dickerson, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Hazel, L. N.

Selection for Growth Rate of Pigs and Productivity of Sows1

G. E. Dickerson and L. N. Hazel2

United States Department of Agriculture

Abstract

The effectiveness of different methods of selecting for improved growth rate of pigs and productivity of sows is compared. Data used are from the Iowa and Nebraska Station swine herds maintained in cooperation with the Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory.

From 8 to 10 times as many boars, and about 3 times as many gilts, as are needed for breeding should be retained long enough after weaning to obtain a measure of growth rate that is more reliable than weaning weight. The rest may be culled at weaning without reducing the effectiveness of selection appreciably.

Several plans for culling sows, differing in the number of litters produced before and after culling and in the number of farrowing seasons each year, are compared. Yearly progress from selection is greatest when sows are culled after the first litter, the best 1/3 to 1/2 being kept for a second litter 6 months after the first. A plan almost as good is that of delaying culling until after the second litter and keeping the best 1/5 to 1/4 of the sows for a third litter at 2 years of age. Progress is retarded by retaining more than the optimum proportion of older sows, because the less intense culling of sows and the longer interval between generations is only partly offset by the more severe culling of gilts and the greater accuracy of sow culling.

Having sows farrow two litters per year is definitely advantageous. It permits the accuracy of selecting boars and gilts to be improved by basing the dam's productivity on two litters instead of one. It also means that the more productive sows may be kept for additional litters with a minimum increase in average interval between generations.


Footnotes

1 Journal paper No. J-1148 of the Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa, in cooperation with the Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, Bureau of Animal Industry, and the Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station. Project 32.

2 The authors are, respectively: associate geneticist, Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, Ames, Iowa; and assistant animal husbandman, Regional Sheep Breeding Laboratory, Dubois, Idaho, Bureau of Animal Industry. Suggestions concerning the presentation of this study by Drs. Jay L. Lush and W. A. Craft are gratefully acknowledged.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1944 by the American Society of Animal Science.