J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1969. 29:283-287.
© 1969 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bayne, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bayne, B. H.
Right arrow Articles by Cole, J. W.

Response of Beef Roasts Differing in Finish, Location and Size to Two Rates of Heat Application

Barbara H. Bayne, Bernadine H. Meyer1 and J. W. Cole2

Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station,,3 Knoxville

Abstract

Eighty roasts consisting of paired small and large, bone-in rib and boneless top-round cuts from five low-finished and five high-finished Hereford steers were studied. One cut from each pair was roasted at 93° C. and the other at 149° C. to end points of 67° C. and 70° C, respectively, according to a balanced-lattice design.

Shear values and sensory scores indicated that roasting at 93° C. yielded more tender meat than roasting at 149° C. (P<.001). Tenderness scores indicated that the 93° C. heat treatment had a greater tenderizing effect on round than rib cuts. The increased tenderness at 93° C. was associated with prolonged cooking time due to a slower rate of heat penetration which could have promoted greater degradation of collagen.

Rib roasts scored higher in tenderness, flavor and juiciness and had lower total cooking losses than round roasts (P<.001). Only flavor scores were affected by degree of finish, being higher for high-finish than for low-finish cuts (P<.001).


Footnotes

1 Appreciation is expressed to Dr. W. T. Butts, Assistant Professor of Animal Husbandry-Veterinary Science, for the experimental design and assistance with statistical analyses and their interpretation.

2 Deceased, December 20, 1968.

3 Departments of Food Science-Institution Management and Animal Husbandry-Veterinary Science. Published with the approval of the Deans of the Agricultural Experiment Station and College of Home Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. A. King, M. E. Dikeman, T. L. Wheeler, C. L. Kastner, and M. Koohmaraie
Chilling and cooking rate effects on some myofibrillar determinants of tenderness of beef
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2003; 81(6): 1473 - 1481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
P. E. Foster, S. M. McCurdy, E. L. Martin, and M. M. Hard
Consumer Quality of Beef Chuck Roasts from Two Breed Types, Two Feedin Regimes, and Two Oven Temperatures
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, November 1, 1979; 8(2): 127 - 137.
[Abstract]


Home page
Family and Consumer Sciences Research JournalHome page
B. H. Bayne, M. B. Allen, N. F. Large, B. H. Meyer, and G. E. Goertz
Sensory and Histological Characteristics of Beef Rib Cuts Heated at Two Rates to Three End Point Temperatures
Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, January 1, 1973; 2(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Animal Science.