J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1969. 29:272-282.
© 1969 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smith, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. T.

Ovine Carcass Cutability

G. C. Smith1, Z. L. Carpenter and G. T. King

Texas A&M University,2 College Station

Abstract

Closely trimmed primal cuts from 577 carcasses were utilized for the development of multiple regression equations for use under varying conditions of feasibility. Eighteen equations were selected to achieve maximum accuracy for prescribed data collection conditions. Simple correlation coefficients of approximately –.74 and –.85 between measures of internal fat deposition and fat thickness over the l. dorsi, respectively, evidenced the profound influence of excessive fatness on percent of lean primal cuts. Attempts to predict trimmed primal cuts weight without the inclusion of carcass weight as an independent variable were unsuccessful. l. dorsi area contributed little to prediction equations unless body wall thickness (singly or combined) was used as the fatness index. The most accurate equations for predicting either percent or weight of trimmed primal cuts consisted of measures of carcass weight, internal fat, total fat thickness and l. dorsi area. However, subsets of independent variables including carcass weight, estimated percent of internal fat, body wall thickness and fat cover score did not require that the carcass be ribbed yet were nearly as accurate. Equations for predicting weight of trimmed cuts have higher coefficients of determination than those predicting percent, but their reliability outside the parent population is subject to question. In general, equations employing carcass weight, internal fat weight or percent and fat thickness measurements, where the latter two traits are either measured or estimated, can be expected to predict weight or percent of lean primal cuts with greater than 80% accuracy. A comparison of equations for the prediction of percent lean primal cuts indicates that those of Johnston et al. (1967), U.S.D.A. (1969) and Field and Riley (1968) most accurately related the differences inherent to the population of lamb carcasses used in the present study.


Footnotes

1 Present address: Washington State University, Pullman.

2 Department of Animal Science, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Animal Science.