J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1969. 28:725-733.
© 1969 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vinson, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, O. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vinson, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, O. W.

Predicted Response to Selection for Crossbred Performance in Mice1,2,

W. E. Vinson3, E. J. Eisen and O. W. Robison4

North Carolina State University, Raleigh

Abstract

Compared in this study were predicted responses of three crossbred selection methods, using estimates of genetic parameters for seven quantitative traits from two genetically diverse mouse populations, designated C2 and ICR, and their reciprocal interpopulation crosses. The methods of crossbred selection were mass selection (MS), half-sib family selection (HS) and reciprocal recurrent selection (RRS). Traits studied were number born, 12-day litter weight, individual weights at birth, 21 (weaning), 42 and 56 days of age and gain from 21 to 42 days. Expected efficiency of MS was larger than HS for all traits. Expected efficiency of RRS was greater than MS for number born only.

Average genetic and average maternal differences between the two populations were significant for all traits. Heterosis, measured as the mean difference between reciprocal F1 crosses and midparent values was also significant for all traits, varying from 3 to 6% of the respective trait means.

Heritabilities in the purebred populations estimated from half-sib covariances were small for number born and weaning weight and moderately high for 12-day litter weight, post-weaning gain and adult body weights. Ratios of the sum of both purebred half-sib covariances to both crossbred half-sib covariances were greater than one for 12-day litter weight and the postweaning weight traits, which is compatible with a partial dominance gene model. This ratio was less than one for litter size, suggesting a possible overdominance situation. Genetic covariances and correlations between purebred and crossbred half-sib family means for the same trait generally agreed with the ratio estimates regarding inference to the type of gene action present.


Footnotes

1 Paper Number 2671 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina State University Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh.

2 This research was supported by Public Health Service Grant GM 11546. Computing services for this investigation were supported by Public Health Service Grant FR-00011.

3 Present address: Animal Science Department, Iowa State University, Ames.

4 The suggestions and discussions of Drs. J. E. Legates, C. W. Stuber and V. M. Timon are greatly appreciated. The authors acknowledge the technical assistance of Mrs. C. Cordrey, Mrs. B. J. Edwards and Mrs. M. Gurganus.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Society of Animal Science.